RAM KRISHAN GROVER AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Tools
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
Bench
RANJAN GOGOI (CJI), NAGESWARA RAO and SANJIV KHANNA
Citation
[2019] 17 S.C.R. 1
Whole judgment (for printing)

Source PDF (original scan)
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0

Judgment · Supreme Court of India · decided · Bench: RANJAN GOGOI (CJI), NAGESWARA RAO and SANJIV KHANNA

[2019] 17 S.C.R. 1

p. 45

AND OTHERS [SANJIV KHANNA, J.]

4646. Before reserving the judgment, we had heard counsel for the appellants on merits and had expressed that we were not inclined to interfere with the factual findings. Accordingly, we have not dealt with the factual matrix in each case and have examined and answered the legal issues raised. In view of the findings upholding the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the Rent Act and its extension and applicability to the Union Territory of Chandigarh, we would dismiss the afore-captioned appeals by the tenants. There would be no order as to costs.

Nidhi Jain Appeals dismissed. C

Whole judgment (for printing)

Report an error in this judgment →

Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0