SABIR HUSSAIN AND ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
Tools
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- (year only)
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, S.B. MAJMUDAR and .
- Citation
- [1995] Supp. 6 S.C.R. 15
Source PDF (original scan)
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Dismissing the appeals, this Court
Held
The omission to specify the number of services in the --r approved scheme does not invalidate the scheme already approved. [16-B]
Reporter's headnote (continued) and case details
NOVEMBER 30, 1995
B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 : Sections 68C, 68D.
Approved scheme-Omission to specify number of se1vices-Held does not invalidate the scheme. c The question in these appeals is whether omission to specify number of services would invalidate the scheme already approved under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
Ramesh Chand v. State of U.P., , relied on. E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3487 of 1979 Etc.
From the Judgment and Order dated 5.10.79 of the Allahabad High Court irt C. Misc. W.P. No. 1567 of 1978. F Appellants-in-person (NIP). ---~.
K.S. C_hauhan and R.B. Misra for the Respondent.
Judgment
The following Order of the Court was delivered : G Though the case has been called twice, the appellants are not present in person. We have taken the assistance of Shri K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the State.
The controversy raised in this case is covered by the Judgment of this Court in Ramesh Chand v. State of U.P., [1980] 1 SCR 498 where this H 15
16 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1995} SUPP. 6 S.C.R.
A Court had held that "failure to specify number of services would not invalidate the draft scheme under Section 68C or the approved scheme trnder Section 680 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939". Same is the question in these appeals also. Under these circumstances, the omission to specify the number of services in the approved scheme does not invalidate the scheme already approved. B The appeals are accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances without costs.
T.N.A. Appeals dismissed. •
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0