STATE OF KERALA v. M.M. ABDUL KHADER
vidhipandit.com/case/sc-s-1995-6-784-785
Decision dates shown here are day-precision where the judgment's own text states a date the extractor is confident in, and year only otherwise -- never a fabricated day. See the editorial policy for how dates are extracted.
Headnote — Supreme Court Reports (editorial summary, not part of the judgment)
Held
Since the award of the Collector is of April, 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under s. 23 (l·A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. [785-C]
Judgment
A
DECEMBER 15, 1995
B
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
S. 23(1-Aj-Award of Collector being dated 21.4.1980-Claimants nor C entitled ro benefits under the section.
The State Government filed appeal against the jndgment of the High Court allowing the claimants, the benefits of s. 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
D Allowing the appeal, this Court
E CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 12120 of 1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 28.1.93 of the Kerala High Court in L.A.A. No. 244 of 1988.
F M.T. George for the Appellants.
N. Sudahakaran for the Respondents.
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
G Leave granted.
The only controversy is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of June 4, 1979, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said H Act. 784
STATEv. M.M.ABDULKHADER 785
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The Order of A the High Court is set aside. No costs.
CA. No. 12121 of 1995
Leave granted. B The only controversy with which we are concerned in this appeal is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Ac~ 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act. c The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The order of the High Court is set aside. No costs.
R.P. Appeals allowed.
Report an error in this judgment →
Contains information from the Indian High Court / Supreme Court Judgments dataset, licensed under CC-BY-4.0